Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice ; : 212-219, 2019.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-758988

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) machines measure blood pressure (BP) multiple times over a brief period. We aimed to compare the results of manual office blood pressure (MOBP) and AOBP methods with ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: This study was performed on 64 patients with CKD (stages 3–4). A nurse manually measured the BP on both arms using a mercury sphygmomanometer, followed by AOBP of the arm with the higher BP and then ABPM. Mean BP readings were compared by paired t test and Bland–Altman graphs. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of participants was 59.3 ± 13.6. The mean ± SD awake systolic BP obtained by ABPM was 140.2 ± 19.0 mmHg, which was lower than the MOBP and AOBP methods (156.6 ± 17.8 and 148.8 ± 18.6 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.001). The mean ± SD awake diastolic BP was 78.6 ± 13.2 mmHg by ABPM which was lower than the MOBP and AOBP methods (88.9 ± 13.2 and 84.1 ± 14.0 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.001). Using Bland–Altman graphs, MOBP systolic BP readings showed a bias of 16.4 mmHg, while AOBP measurements indicated a bias of 8.6 mmHg compared with ABPM. CONCLUSION: AOBP methods may be more reliable than MOBP methods for determining BP in patients with CKD. However, the significantly higher mean BPs recorded by AOBP method suggested that AOBPs may not be as accurate as ABPM in patients with CKD.


Subject(s)
Humans , Arm , Bias , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Blood Pressure , Hypertension , Methods , Reading , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Sphygmomanometers
2.
IJMS-Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012; 37 (4): 274-276
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-160544

ABSTRACT

Diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA] is characterized by excessive production of organic acids leading to a low blood pH. Rarely, because of other complicating factors blood pH may be in the alkalemic range and the term diabetic ketoalkalosis has been coined to describe this condition. So far, less than 30 such cases have been reported in the literature. We report a 34-year-old woman who received methylprednisolone pulse therapy for the treatment of pancreas transplant rejection. Thereafter, she developed vomiting and abdominal pain. Her laboratory data showed high blood sugar, hypokalemia, alkalemic pH, elevated plasma anion gap, and significant ketonemia. She responded well to the treatment of DKA. It was concluded that an alkalemic pH does not rule out the presence of ongoing DKA. In suspected cases, changes in plasma anion gap and bicarbonate and the presence of ketonemia should be noted

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL